Food for thought about those exaggerators among the callers to Imaamah or the Khilaafah!

Written by abumuaawiyah on October 31, 2015. Posted in Calling To Islam - 'Da'wa', Deviated Callers & Individuals, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Scholars of Islam.

Ibnul Mutahhir (a raafidi) said that Imaamah is the most important obligation.

Response: This is a lie according to the consensus of the scholars, for Imaan [i.e. belief in Allaah; belief in Allaah’s Angels; belief in Allaah’s Books; belief in Allaah’s Messengers; belief in the hereafter and belief in Qadr-its good and evil)] is more important. And from those affairs that are known by everyone in the religion is that when the disbelievers during the era of Messenger entered into the fold of Islaam, the rulings of Islaam were conveyed to them and Imaamah was not mentioned to them in any situation. Then how can it be the most important obligation?!

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

[Source: Al-Muntaqaa Min Minhaaj Al-I’tidaal Fee Naqdi Kalaam Ahl Ar-Rafdi Wal-Itizaal’ page 26-27 by Muhibbud-deen khateeb (rahimahullaah)]

Abu Mu’aawiyah (Abdullah Al-Gambi)

3 Days Has Passed, But We’re Still Waiting for Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz al-Huda and Markaz as-Sunnah to announce Their Stance towards Usaamah Bin Laadin, Zakir Niak and Lashkar Taibah

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on September 2, 2015. Posted in Brotherhood, Calling To Islam - 'Da'wa', Deviated Callers & Individuals, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Allaah (The Most High) stated:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا كُونُوا قَوَّامِينَ بِالْقِسْطِ شُهَدَاءَ لِلَّهِ وَلَوْ عَلَىٰ أَنْفُسِكُمْ أَوِ الْوَالِدَيْنِ وَالْأَقْرَبِينَ ۚ إِنْ يَكُنْ غَنِيًّا أَوْ فَقِيرًا فَاللَّهُ أَوْلَىٰ بِهِمَا ۖ فَلَا تَتَّبِعُوا الْهَوَىٰ أَنْ تَعْدِلُوا ۚ وَإِنْ تَلْوُوا أَوْ تُعْرِضُوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ خَبِيرًا

O you who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah, even though it be against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, be he rich or poor, Allah is a Better Protector to both (than you). So follow not the lusts (of your hearts), lest you may avoid justice, and if you distort your witness or refuse to give it, verily, Allah is Ever Well-Acquainted with what you do. [4:135]

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said: We call to the methodology of the Salaf—to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger. We utilize them as proofs in our creed; in our acts of worship; in our stances; in our relationship with the rulers and the ruled and in our relationship with the groups and sects. As for others, they play games and tricks. By Allaah! You do not find them except that they play tricks and games with the passion (or inclinations) of the youth. [End of quote]

O Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz al-Huda and Markaz as-Sunnah! We are still waiting for your stance towards Usaamah Bin Laadin, Zakir Niak and Lashkar Taibah! Indeed Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah) refuted Usamah Bin Laadin. See page 4 in this pdf:

Bin-Baaz_Says_Bin_laadin_Is_Misguided

Also see link:

http://www.takfiris.com/takfir/articles/kpavv-usamah-bin-laden-is-a-takfiri-kharijite-and-is-worse-than-the-kharijites-of-old-by-far.cfm

O Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz as-Sunnah and Markaz al-Huda! What is your stance after Imaam Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah) has clarified with unambiguous evidences to show that Usaamah Bin Laadin is misguided? Once again, we remind you of Allaah’s (The Most High):

Allaah (The Most High) stated:

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

[1] A Notification to the Confused and Bewildered Caller to Brotherhood at [Markaz As-Sunnah’ Stoke-On-Trent (Allies of The Hizbiyyoon of Greenlane’s Admin)]

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on August 31, 2015. Posted in Brotherhood, Calling To Islam - 'Da'wa', Deviated Callers & Individuals, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Allaah (The Most High) said:

لَيْسَ بِأَمَانِيِّكُمْ وَلَا أَمَانِيِّ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ ۗ مَنْ يَعْمَلْ سُوءًا يُجْزَ بِهِ وَلَا يَجِدْ لَهُ مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ وَلِيًّا وَلَا نَصِيرًا

“It will not be in accordance with your desires (Muslims), nor those of the People of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), whosoever works evil, will have the recompense thereof).”

Imaam as-Sa’di (rahimahullaah) stated that a person merely ascribing himself to any religion will not be of any benefit if he fails to produce evidence to support the soundness of his claims, for actions are what will either testify to the truthfulness of a claim or belie it. [For full details, see Tayseer Al-Kareem Ar-Rahmaan Fee Tafseer Kalaam Al-Mannaan]

Indeed once again those who either follow their desires or deliberately refuse to utilise their intellects are seeking to abandon reality, whilst clinging to delusion and wishful thinking. So they say: What is your verdict against Shaikh Wasiyullaah because he visits a Masjid you guys call hizbiyyoon. Reader: A sensible and truthful person should abandon the likes of these statements because they’re nothing else but emotional nonsense; rather a sensible person should ask himself, saying: What is the basis of the criticisms directed at Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz As-Sunnah and Markaz al-Huda by Masjid Al-Furqan- is it because of Shaikh Wasiyullah or is it about the Manhaj of [Markaz At-Tawheed, Markaz As-Sunnah and Markaz al-Huda- the allies of the hizbiyyoon of Greenlane’s Admin?!]

Therefore, a sensible and truthful person will not deny the fact that the affair is about the Manhaj of these Maraakiz and not about Shaikh Wasiyullaah, regardless whether the Shaikh visits them or not. The reality of a Hizbi Markaz does not change due to the presence of a Shaikh. These Maraakiz in stoke are nothing else but an extension of Greenlane’s Manhaj and we find that one of Greenlane’s main caller to hizbiyyah and misguidance [the man of Bidah Abu Usama (Goldie)] lectures at Markaz at-Tawheed. See here about Abu Usama: http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1216-A-Response-to-the-Deceit-of-Abu-Usaamah-Khalifah-and-His-Lying-Tongue

It is absolutely clear to the Admin of Masjid al-Furqaan, the Admin of Al-Markazus Salafi (Manchester) the Admin of Salafipublication and others that Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz Al-Huda and Markaz as-Sunnah are allies of Greenlane’s Hizbi Admin and the man of bidah Abu Usama. Therefore, there is no need to discuss the matter with the confused caller to brotherhood at Markaz as-Sunnah because their companions are none else but the hardcore hizbiyyoon at Greenlane.

Abu Hurairah (radiyallaahu-anhu) said, the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: A person is upon the religion of his friend, so let each one of you look at whom he befriends. [As-Saheehah: 97]

Ibn Mas’ ood (radiyallaahu-anhu) said: Indeed a person walks alongside and accompanies the one whom he loves and who is like him. (Al Ibaanah 2/476).

Al A’maah (rahimahullaah) said: They (the Salaf) did not used to ask anything more about a person after having asked about three affairs: Who he walks with, who he enters upon (i.e. visits) and who he associates with amongst the people. (Al Ibaanah 2/478)

Abdullah Ibn Mas’ood (radiyallaahu anhu) said: Make consideration of the (regions of the) earth by the names given to them and make consideration of a person by his companion. ” (Al Ibaanah 2/497).

Mu’aadh Bin Mu’aadh said to Yahyah bin Sa’eed, “Yaa Abaa Sa’eed! A person may hide his viewpoint from us, but he will not be able to hide this in his son or friend or in one whom he sits with. (Al Ibaanah 2/436)

Indeed Marakaz At-Tawheed, Markaz As-Sunnah and Markaz Al-Huda are allies of the hardcore hizbiyyoon at Greenlane’s Admin and Greenlane’s Admin are allies of the deviant organizations, such as Ihya Turaath and Al-Maghrib Institute. Markaz at-Tawheed in particular invited Adnaan Abdul-Qaadir of Ihya Turaath-(the student and shelterer of the ikhwaani innovator Abdur-Rahmaan Bin Abdul-Kaaliq): See here about Ihya Turaath- the allies of Greenlane: http://www.salafitalk.net/st/printthread.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=5220 and see here about the innovator Abdur Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq: http://salaficentre.com/2012/04/abdur-rahmaan-abdul-khaaliq-visits-shaikh-muhammad-al-banna-rahimahullaah/

However, the confused caller to brotherhood at Markaz as-Sunnah is ignorant of the fact that the Salafiyyoon of Masjid Al-Furqan and other Salafiyyoon have never warned against the likes of these Maraakiz except due to the fact that these Maraakiz are allies and shelterers of the hizbiyyoon at Greenlane- the allies of Ihya Turaath and Al-Maghrib Institute. So let it be known to the confused caller to brotherhood at Markaz as-Sunnah that we took a firm stance (by the Tawfeeq of Allaah) against Grenlane’s old Admin (under Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth and Abdul Haadi) due to their deviations, even though Shaikh Wasiyullah defended them. So Shaikh Wasiyullah criticized SP due to SP’s uncompromising and courageous stance against Suhaib Hasan, Abdul Haadi and Jamiat ahle Hadeeth. See here about Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth: See here: http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=3384

Likewise, the confused caller to brotherhood at Markaz as-Sunnah should be aware of the fact that we maintain the same stance against the New Hizbi Admin at Greenlane-allies of ahlul bidah and the deviants at Ihya Turaath and al-Maghrib Institute. Therefore O confused caller to brotherhood at Markaz as-Sunnah! This was the basis of the Shaikh’s criticism against SP and their Salafi brothers, and it has not ceased to be a criticism that is in opposition to reality and devoid of evidence.

On the other hand, Shaikh Wasiyullah’s or any other Shaikh’s visit to a Markaz of Hizbiyyah will not change the reality of such Markaz whilst they maintain their corrupt alliances with ahlul bidah, such as Ihya Turaath and its deviants like Adnaan Abdul Qaadir- the student of the innovator Abdur Rahmaan Bin Abdul Khaaliq. Shaikh Ubaid Bin Abdillaah Al-Jaabiri (may Allaah preserve him) said: The one who knows of a mistake and it is clear to him, then it is not permissible for him to blindly follow a scholar to whom an affair is hidden. And indeed you already heard yesterday that the scholars are not infallible in their Ijtihaadaat. Therefore, it is not permissible to adopt them (i.e. the mistakes of the scholars) as a methodology (to follow). http://salaficentre.com/2013/08/2-an-eye-opener-for-the-seeker-of-truth-alallaamah-ubaid-bin-abdillaah-al-jaabiri-answers/

Finally: We ask Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz As-Sunnah and Markaz Al-Huda a simple question and that is: What is your stance towards Ahlul Bidah, such as Usama Bin Laadin- is he a khaariji or not? Likewise what is your stance towards Lashkar Taybah (Jamaa’atud Da’wah) and Zakair Niak? Are they upon the Sunnah and Salafiyyah or are they from Ahlul Bidah? Indeed, if you are truthful, then manifest your stance, just as Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali) said: We call to the methodology of the Salaf—to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger. We utilize them as proofs in our creed; in our acts of worship; in our stances; in our relationship with the rulers and the ruled and in our relationship with the groups and sects. As for others, they play games and tricks. By Allaah! You do not find them except that they play tricks and games with the passion (or inclinations) of the youth.

As for the Admin of Masjid al-Furqan, their Manhaj is manifest! They do not defend or co-operate with a single Mubtadi, such as Abdur Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq and his organization Ihya Turaath! They do not keep quiet about the people of bidah, such as Zakir Niak and Usama Bin Ladin. Likewise, they free themselves from Lashkar Taibah (Jamaa’atud Dawah) and all other people of misguidance.

And Allaah knows best

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

Reminder to the Salafiyyoon at Masjid Al-Furqan (Stoke-on-Trent): A Pdf Doc that will acquaint you with Ihsan Hanif’s -(a staunch partner in Greenlane’s Hizbiyyah)- hizbi allies, companions associates, so that you are not deceived by anyone invited at Markaz at-Tawheed or elsewhere

Written by abumuaawiyah on August 28, 2015. Posted in Deviated Callers & Individuals.

Assalaamu alaykum warahmatullaah;

This pdf doc allies_companions_associates will acquaint you with the hizbi Manhaj of Ihsan Hanif- an active participant in Greenlane’s hizbiyyah. He is mentioned on page 24, but you must read everything before page 24 in order to see clearly who the hizbi associates, companions and allies of Ihsan Hanif are. Note: Do not rush, rather even read a page everyday until you are acquainted with the falsehood that surrounds these people so that you are not deceived by any hizbi invited to speak at Markaz At-Tawheed or elsewhere.

———————————————-

Abu Mu’aawiyah (Abdullah Al-Gambi)

Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz Rebutted the Innovator Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq, For Slandering and Belittling the Saudi Ulama

Written by abumuaawiyah on August 25, 2015. Posted in Brotherhood, Calling To Islam - 'Da'wa', Deviated Callers & Individuals, Fatawa-Rulings, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations, Scholars of Islam.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The Mubtadi Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul khaaliq (may Allaah guide him) stated:

Indeed the group of scholars in Saudi are in a (state) of complete blindness and ignorance regarding the new problems and their Salafiyyah is Taqleediyyah (i.e. Salafiyyah based on blind following) and it is not worthy of anything.

Imaam Abdul-Azeez Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah) responded:

This speech is false, for indeed the scholars of Saudi are acquainted with the problems of the era and indeed they have written a lot about it, and I am from them- Bi hamdil laah! Indeed they have written in that regard that which cannot be counted (i.e. numerous) and they- Bi Hamdil laah- are among those who are the most knowledgeable of the Madhab of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa’ah and they follow that which the Salafus Saaleh followed in the subject matter of Tawheed, Asmaa Was-Sifaat, the subject matter of warning against bidah and in all the abwaab (areas of knowledge. Read -if you are ignorant- the Majmoo’ah of Ibn Qaasim (Ad-Durar As-Saniyyah) and the Fataawaa of our Shaikh Muhammad Bin Ibraaheem (rahimahullaah). Read what we have written in that regard (i.e. the affairs of the era) in our Fataawaa and our books are widespread among the people.

There is no doubt that what he (i.e. Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq) said about the scholars of Saudi is not correct- it is a mistake and a munkar (evil affair). It is obligatory upon you (i.e. Abdul Khaaliq) to recant from that and announce that in the newspapers in Kuwait and Saudi. We ask Allaah for guidance- for ourselves and you- and a return to the truth and steadfastness upon it. Indeed He (Allaah) is the best of those who are asked. [Source: Al-Majoo 8/242]

Shared by Abu Haleemah Naeem Bashir [Masjid al-Furqan (stoke)]

Abu Mu’aawiyah (Abdullah Al-Gambi)

Have you ever heard of this rebellious raafidi devil?!

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on July 28, 2015. Posted in Deviated Callers & Individuals, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties.

Imaam Ibn Katheer (rahimahullaah) said: He [Ibnul Mu-izz (411AH)] was a despot and a rebellious devil.

Some of his ugly characteristics and cursed way of life

There was much instability in his actions, judgements and statements. He claimed Uloohiyyah (i.e. to be deified and worshipped) just as pharaoh did. He used to command the people to stand up in rows to exalt his mention and show respect to his name when his name was mentioned by the khateeb on the pulpit. This was done in all the places under his ruler ship.

He commanded the people of Egypt in particular that they should prostrate when his name is mentioned. And even those people in the markets and those who did not establish the five daily prayers and the Juma’ah Friday prayer used to prostrate when his name was mentioned. They used to abandon prostration for Allaah on Fridays (i.e. they did not attend the Friday prayer) and (the prayer) on other days, but they prostrated to the ruler (i.e. Ibnul Mu-izz).

He used to command the Jews and Christians to embrace Islaam whilst they hated to do so, and thereafter he permitted them to return to their religions. He used to destroy their churches and synagogues and rebuilt them again. Then he would kill them, destroy their churches and synagogues.

He forced the people to close the markets during the day and open them at night. This command was obeyed for a long period until he came across a man -several times- who was engaged in carpentry in the last hours of the day; so he approached him and said: “Have you not been forbidden (i.e. from working during the day)?” He (i.e. the man) said: “O my Sayyid! When the people seek after their livelihoods during the day, they would stay up late during the night (in pursuit of their livelihoods); and when they seek after their livelihoods during the night, they would stay up late during the day (in pursuit of their livelihoods). This this is a part of staying up late.” He (ibnul Mu-zz) laughed and left him, and thereafter he returned the people to their previous affair (i.e. work during the day).

———————————————————————————————————————————————————-

[Source: For further details, see: Shaikh Muqbil’s (rahimahullaah) Book titled: Ilhaadul Khumeini Fee Ardil Haramayn page: 163-168]

Reminder to the noble brother and sisters at Masjid al-Fuqaan (Stoke): Arm yourselves with these clarifications in order to distance the people from the man of Bidah (Goldie) and His Staunch allies in your City

Written by abumuaawiyah on July 1, 2015. Posted in Announcements, Brotherhood, Calling To Islam - 'Da'wa', Deviated Callers & Individuals, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Scholars of Islam.

A Misunderstanding Regarding The Statement, ‘Laa Inkaar Fee Masaa’il Al-Khilaaf [There Should Be No Repudiation In The affairs of Khilaaf (i.e. differing)]

Some people are under the illusion that what is intended by this statement is that it impermissible to repudiate (others) regarding any affair in which difference of opinion is held. So based upon this (illusion of theirs), it becomes impermissible to disapprove of a Munkar (an evil) unless there is complete agreement in doing so. This is a wrong understanding which necessitates the termination of enjoining good and forbidding evil.

The scholars (i.e. of Ahlus Sunnah) hold differences of opinion in most of the Masaa’il (i.e. the verdicts on fiqh and subsidiary issues). And what is correct regarding this statement ‘Laa Inkaar Fee Masaa’il Al-Khilaaf- There should be no repudiation in affairs of Khilaaf (differing)’ is that there should neither be harshness in (one’s) disapproval nor (in one’s) criticism regarding those issues about which there is no manifest proof to be taken as the final (verdict). And the basis upon which this is founded is that the issues of khilaaf (differing) are of two categories:

The First Category: They are those issues of khilaaf in which there is proof necessitating that it should be taken as the final (verdict). So here, the proof must be taken and the other statement (or opinion) in opposition is discarded. And whoever follows the statement (or opinion) that is established to be in opposition to the proofs, then he is to be repudiated.

The Second Category: It is those issues of khilaaf in which the proof has not been manifested in order to be taken as the final (verdict). It is an affair in which the evidences contend with each other or the views are at variance. This is an issue of Ijtihaad, and there is neither disapproval nor reprimand against the one in opposition; rather advice is given to acquaint (each other) with the statement that carries more weight. This second category of (khilaaf) is what is intended by the statement ‘Laa Inkaar Fee Masaa-il Al-Khilaaf’ which some people have understood in an unrestricted manner. [1]

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadee Al Madkhalee (hafidha-hullaah) said:

We do not say that there are people of ijtihaad amongst ahlul bidah because they are followers of desires, and Allaah and His Messenger have testified to this. The misguided innovator stirs up discord (or splitting) and errs, and then says to you, ‘This is ijtihaad’.

When Hikmatiyaar and the misguided parties (in Afghanistan) murdered Shaikh Jameel Ur-Rahmaan, they said: ‘This is ijtihaad’. Making lawful the spilling of the blood of the Salafis is Ijtihaad to them. This is what it is! They (ahlul bidah) do not fall into an affair of misguidance or a calamity except that they say, ‘This is ijtihaad’. This is diluting Islaam. It is falsehood, misguidance and bidah mixed with truth when the mistakes of the (true and qualified scholars of ijtihaad)- for which they are rewarded- are placed at the same level with innovation about which the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said that it will be in the fire. [2]

————————————————————————————-

[1] [Source: Ibaaraat Moohimah, page 25’ by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Umar Saalim Baazmool (may Allaah preserve him). Abridged and slightly paraphrased]

[2] Ajwibatul Allaamatush Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadee Al Madkhalee Alaa As-ilah Abee Rawaaha Al-Manhajiyyah; page: 20

Reminder to our noble brothers and sisters at Masjid Al-Furqan (Stoke): Arm yourselves with these clarifications in order to guide the common people away from those who defend Goldie and others from ahlul bidah

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on July 1, 2015. Posted in Announcements, Brotherhood, Calling To Islam - 'Da'wa', Deviated Callers & Individuals, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations, Scholars of Islam.

Shaikh Muhammad Baazmool (may Allaah preserve him) responded to the statement of some of the people who say: ‘Do Not Scrutinize the Beliefs and Mistakes of the People.’

Response

This statement is reiterated by some people when warning reaches them from one of the scholars or a student of knowledge against innovated statements (or views) views that have occurred from some of the people, or when informed about mistakes committed in knowledge and he is given warning against it, you find that his face becomes red, his (behaviour) changes and he says, ‘Do not scrutinize the beliefs of the people and do not search for their mistakes.’

The reality is that this statement is truth by way of which falsehood is sought in this particular instance.

Firstly: The right place to (use this statement) is where one seeks after secrets and hidden affairs, which have neither manifested nor are there any factual evidences indicating towards that. The place (where this statement cannot be used) is where innovation arises from one of (the people) or when one of them calls to falsehood, since there is a difference between that which is manifested and that which is either concealed, hidden and unknown, or that there is no indication towards that.

Secondly: This statement of theirs will lead to the abandonment of warning against mistakes and censure against innovation and falsehood. And the meaning of this is that the common people will be beguiled, rather even some of the students of knowledge will become inattentive to this situation.

Thirdly: Was the speech of the Salaf with regards to warning against innovation and the people of falsehood not (carried out) from the angle of warning against false beliefs, innovations and affairs in opposition to the Sunnah? So how can it be said, ‘do not scrutinize the beliefs and mistakes of the people’ to a person who either warns against an innovation manifested by an individual or points out a mistake committed by an individual?

Fourthly: Scrutinizing the beliefs of the people by way of interrogation and trial as the Khaleefah Mamoon did with regards to the belief that the (Qur’aan is created), then this is an innovation that is warned against. (However) to make a clarification and (issue) warning against an innovation that some people call to, unveiling the falsehood of the callers to falsehood and (issue) warning against them, this is not from that (type of scrutiny that is warned against).

Fifthly: Those (people) who blame the one who unveils the (affairs) of the people of falsehood and issues warning against them, then it is that they either disapprove of innovations or do not. If they disapprove of innovation; point out mistakes and falsehood and warn against them, then indeed they have pursued the right course by the Will of Allaah (The Most High). But why do they disapprove of those who take their place in renouncing innovation?! And if they do not warn the people against falsehood, then this (behaviour or stance of theirs) is not from the methodology of the Salaf and it suffices as a rebuke against them.

Sixthly: It has been reported in Durar As-Saniyyah (1/33) that the Imaam, the Mujaddid, Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah) said: I hold that the people of innovation are to be boycotted and their affair is to be made known until they repent. I pass judgement against them based on what is apparent and I leave their secrets (or hidden) affairs to Allaah. And I believe that every newly invented matter in the Religion is an innovation.

This [statement of Imaam Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah)] is the statement of a Salafiy Athariy [i.e. a true follower of the Salaf and the authentic narrations] that emanates from the statement of Umar Ibnul Khattaab (radiyallaahu-anhu) when he said:

‘People were (sometimes) judged by the revealing of a Divine Inspiration during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle but now there is no longer any more (new revelation). Now we judge you by the deeds you practice publicly, so we will trust and favour the one who does good deeds in front of us, and we will not call him to account about what he is really doing in secret, for Allah will judge him for that; but we will not trust or believe the one who presents to us with an evil deed even if he claims that his intentions were good.’ [Saheeh Bukhaari; Vol 3; Hadith Number:2641]

So examine the statement of Imaam Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah), when he said: ‘I judge (ahlul bidah) based upon what is apparent’‘ and examine the statement of Umar Ibnul Khattaab (radiyallaahu-anhu) when he said, ‘but we will not trust or believe the one who presents to us with an evil deed even if he claims that his intentions were good.’ Then examine the (affair) of that person who disapproves of one who warns against ahlul bidah and exposes their falsehood, he claims that (this warning against ahlul bidah) is from the angle of scrutinizing the Aqeedah of the people. Is this (statement of his) correct? Glorified and Exalted You are, O My Lord! Is not judgement passed against the people except through what is apparent?! This principle affirmed by Al Faarooq, Umar Ibnul Khattaab (radiyallaah-anhu) is employed in warning against a person of innovation when he manifests his innovation. [1]

The Stance of Imaam Ahmad towards Daawood Ibn Ali Al- Asbahaanee

Daawood Ibn Ali Al-Asbahaanee came to Saaleh Ibn Imaam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal with whom he used to have a good relationship. So he (Daawood) spoke to Saaleh Ibn Imaam Ahmad to make it easy for him to meet his father.

So Saaleh approached Imaam Ahmad (i.e. his father) and said; A man asked me to bring him to you.

Imaam Ahmad: What is his name?

Saaleh: Daawood.

Imaam Ahmad: Where is he from?

Saaleh: He is from the people of Asbahaan.

Imaam Ahmad: Has he being (involved) in fabricating anything?

At this point: Saaleh refrained from describing Daawood to his father (Imaam Ahmad). So he (Imaam Ahmad) did not stop enquiring about Daawood until he realized who he was. Then he said: Muhammad Bin Yahyaa An-Naysabooree wrote to me about this (Daawood) saying that he (Daawood) claims that the Qur’aan is something that was brought into existence (i.e. created), so do not bring him near me.

Saaleh: O my father! he (Daawood) has negated and renounced this (statement).

Imaam Ahmad: Muhammad Bin Yahyaa is more trustworthy than him. I do not give you permission to bring him to me.

O my brother! Contemplate upon the stance of Imaam Ahmad. Is this the Imaam? He is the Imaam of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah in his adherence to the Sunnah of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) and in following the narrations of the Sahaabah; so did he use to scrutinize the beliefs of the people and seek after their mistakes?! Examine his statement and that of Umar Ibnul Khattaab mentioned earlier, ‘but we will not trust or believe the one who presents to us with an evil deed even if he claims that his intentions were good.’

Therefore, the statement of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah) is certified by the statement of the Rightly Guided Khaleefah Umar Ibnul Khattaab (radiyallaahu-anhu) and that of Imaam Ahmad Bin Hanbal (rahimahullaah). [2]

——————————————————————————————————-
[1] Source: ‘Ibaaraat Moohimah’ pages 66-68; by Shaikh Umar Baazmool (may Allaah preserve him)

[2] Ibaaraat Moohimah’ pages: 66-69

Reminder: Greenlane’s Admin and their caller to falsehood (Goldie)

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on June 28, 2015. Posted in Announcements, Calling To Islam - 'Da'wa', Deviated Callers & Individuals, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations.

http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1216-A-Response-to-the-Deceit-of-Abu-Usaamah-Khalifah-and-His-Lying-Tongue

http://salaficentre.com/2013/08/salafi-publications-and-greenlane-masjid-what-is-the-basis-of-the-differing/

http://salaficentre.com/2015/01/part-1-the-reality-of-dr-ali-shibls-praise-for-greenlanes-admin-and-his-attacks-against-their-critics/

Follow The Sunnah and Do Not Follow ISIS’ – khutbah by Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on June 27, 2015. Posted in Announcements, Articles, Belief - 'Aqeedah', Brotherhood, Calling To Islam - 'Da'wa', Deviated Callers & Individuals, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations, Seeking Knowledge.