Skip to main content

[1] Ijtihaad and Taqleed: [Thorns in the throat of the Prattler and Stooge of The Hizbiyyoon at Markaz As’Sunnah (Stoke On Trent) – The One Submerged In Self-Inflicted Ambiguity, Confusion and Ignorance]

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on . Posted in Refutations, Scholars of Islam, Seeking Knowledge.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Introduction

Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan, hafidhahullaah said: “As for the permissible form of blind-following (at-taqleedul-mubaah), then it is for the common person (aamee) who, if he does not follow the people of knowledge, then he will stray from the path. Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic, said: ”Ask the people of knowledge if you do not know” .[An-Nahl 16:43]

And taqleed is not done to just anyone. Rather, it is done to one who is accredited with knowledge and piety and is known to the people for this.

Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah, rahimahullaah, said: “When a Muslim is faced with a problamatic situation, he should seek a verdict from one whom he believes will give him a verdict based upon what Allaah and His Messenger have legislated; whatever school of thought (madhhab) he belongs to. It is not obligatory upon any Muslim to blindly follow a particular individual from the scholars in all that he says. Nor is it obligatory upon any Muslim to blindly follow a particular madhhab from the scholars in all that it necessitates and informs. Rather, every person’s saying is taken or left, except that of the Allaah’s Messenger sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam. To follow the madhhab of a particular individual because of an inability of knowing what has been legislated, is from that which is permissible; it is not from that which is obligatory upon every individual – if they have the ability to know what has been legislated without this path of blind-following (taqleed). So each individual should fear Allaah as much as he is able, and seek knowledge of what Allaah and His Messenger have ordered; doing what is commanded and keeping away from that which is forbidden. “

Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah also said: “As for the one who has the ability to perform ijtihaad, is it permissible for him to do taqleed? About this there is a difference of opinion, with the correct opinion being that it is permissible in cases where he is unable to perform ijtihaad; either due to the proofs being similar, or due to a time constraint in being able to perform ijtihaad, or due to the proof not being apparent to him. So in cases where he is unable, the obligation of ijtihaad is lifted from him due to this inability.”

The Prohibited Forms of Taqleed

Ibn al-Qayyim, rahimahullaah, said about the prohibitted types of taqleed:

“It is of three types:- Firstly: totaly turning away from what Allaah has revealed, but rather being satisfied with the taqleed of ones for-fathers.

Secondly: doing taqleed of someone when you do not know whether that person is from those whose saying can be taken.

Thirdly: doing taqleed after the proofs have been established and it becomes apparent that the evidence contradicts the view of the one to whom taqleed is done.”

Imaam Ahmad bin Hanbal, rahimahullaah, said: “How strange it is that a people who know the chain of narratiuon of a hadeeth (isnaad) and its authenticity, yet still they follow the opinion of Sufy aan [ath-Thawree]; even though Allaah, the Exalted, said:

Let those beware, who oppose the command of the Messenger, lest some trial (fitnah) befalls them, or a painful punishment is inflicted upon them. [Soorah an-Noor 24:63].

Do you know what the fitnah is? The fitnah is shirk! Since the rejection of some of his sayings could cause something of deviation to enter into the heart, and thus be destroyed.”

Shaykh Abdur-Rahmaan ibn Hasan (the grandson of Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahab), rahimahullaah, said: “In the words of Imaam Ahmad, rahimahullaah, is an indication that doing taqleed before the proofs reach a person is not blameworthy. Rather, the one who is to be censured is that person to whom the proofs reach, yet he opposes them due to [adhering to] the saying of his scholar. “ [Source: Salafipublications.com Article Id : MNJ060005 ]

———————————————————————————————————–

Must Read: visit  www.salafipublications.com and see articles titled:

Fataawaa of the Major Committee of Scholars on Taqlid and Madhhabs [Article ID: MNJ060007 ]

Shaikh Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah) On The Issue of Ijtihaad and Taqleed [Article ID: MNJ060001

 

The Prattler and Stooge of The Hizbiyyoon at Markaz As-Sunnah Spreads The Baatil Principles of The Followers of Al-Halabi, But Claims That Accepting The Knowledge Based Refutations Against Such falsehood Is Tantamount to Blind Following!

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on . Posted in Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said:

They (i.e. the people of baatil and fitan) do not keep quiet- they spread their falsehoods in their newspapers, magazines and audio tapes, while wishing that the voice of truth should be silent. In their view, the voice of truth is what should be silent and the voice of falsehood should be raised and spread in the earth! Do they remain silent?! The people of falsehood do not remain silent-they neither abate nor slow down.[1]

Indeed, the prattler refuses to accept reality! He spreads the false principles and ambiguities propagated by the followers of the innovator Ali Al-Halabi, but when such falsehoods and ambiguities are rebutted by the Salafiyyoon through the unambiguous and detailed knowledge based proofs presented by the likes of Shaikh Rabee and others, he claims that the Salafiyyoon are blind followers. This is the same tactic that was employed by the innovators Ali Al-Halabi, Abul Hasan Al-Maribi and others. Obviously we do not believe and intend that the prattler is an innovator, but this behaviour of his is no different from that of these innovators. Likewise, this is the same tactic employed by the man of bidah Abu Usaama, who is an ally of his employers at Markaz as’Sunnah (may Allaah guide them).

O Allaah guide them all,  but if he (the prattler) and his employers at Markaz As’Sunnah continue to propagate falsehood, then grant us firmness and tawfeeq to refute them .. Aameen

We warn the prattler against self amazement, as the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said:

”Three things destroy: The greed that is obeyed, the desires that are followed and a person being amazed with his own opinion.” [2]

Shaikh Raslaan (may Allaah preserve him) said: Indeed the great religion of Islaam is founded upon knowledge and not ignorance, but when a person is amazed with himself and his opinion, and when splitting occurs in the Ummah in the big affairs of knowledge and every foolish one formulates his own independent judgement, there comes about an uncontrollable chaos –leading to a path that does not cease, becomes an affair of trial, corruption, confusion, deviation and an affair in which truth is confounded with falsehood [3]

To be continued..InShaaAllaah

——————————————————————————————————

[1] Source: Question number 16; Page 28-29 in الإجابات الجلية عن القضايا المنهجية

Note: This particular excerpt is found in the second section of the book, titled:

كشف الستار عما تحمله بعض الدعوات من أخطار

[2]Silsilah Al-hadeeth as-saheehah: Number: 1802: 4/412-416]

[3] Ash-Shi-aaraat Wahdahaa Laa Takfee: pages: 35 and 39 Footnote 1]

 

The Prattler and Stooge of The Hizbiyyoon at Markaz As’Sunnah -Allies of Greenlane and Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth in Stoke On Trent- Makes a Fool of Himself Again By Transmitting The Old Hizbi Shubhah: [Are We Obliged To Follow The Stance of Scholar When He Makes Tabdee?]

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on . Posted in Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations.

 

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Once again the prattler and stooge of the hizbiyyoon at Markaz As-Sunnah made a fool of himself! He visits the websites of the followers of the innovator Ali Al-Halabi and transmits their spider wed doubts. His latest prattling revolves around the affair as to whether we are obliged to follow the stance of scholar when he makes Tabdee. This is an old refuted doubt of the hizbiyyoon, but because the prattler is an ill-informed newcomer and amateur doubt monger, he chooses to do the doggy job of his employers at Markaz As-Sunnah, rather than sincerely acquaint himself with the sound principles of the Salafi Manhaj. Here is a short clarification for the prattler – either he accepts it (may Allaah guide him) or he continues to follow his desires and carry on doing the doggy job of his employers at Markaz As-Sunnah. Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) says:

He (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) sent individuals to Bahrain, Oman and Yemen and their narrations were accepted; so how about in this present time of ours when there are ten or fifty Salafi (scholars) who are in agreement regarding a particular affair, but their narrations are rejected. And those who reject them, say: ‘’There has to be a consensus of all the scholars.’’  And from the false principles of these people is that they say: ‘’we neither accept criticism against a person nor a praise for him even if many of the contemporary scholars say that such a person is an innovator.’’ 

Therefore be warned against these people, because they make a claim to Salafiyyah, whilst seeking to destroy the Salafi Methodology, its principles and foundations.  How many false precepts do they have, such as their saying: ‘’I am not obliged to (take/accept) the speech of such and such a Shaikh?!’’  You find a scholar quoting and refuting the affairs of misguidance found in the Book of such and such a person, in such and such page, yet you find these people saying: ‘’I am not obliged to (take/accept) the speech of such and such a Shaikh?!’’

This statement of theirs is a principle by way of which they seek to shun and reject truth.  It is a false principle by way of which they seek to reject the sound principles of Jarh Wat-Tadeel.  Therefore, learn the sound principles of Jarh Wat-Tadeel and look to the methodology of the Salaf; and leave alone these who misguide. They bring turmoil upon the true religion of Allaah and upon the Methodology of the Salaf and its followers. http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/02/they-say-we-are-not-obliged-to-take-the-speech-of-the-shaikh-so-how-many-trustworthy-scholars-do-they-need-in-order-to-abandon-the-innovators/

Also see link here – Refuting the Satanic Principle; There has to be a Consensus on a refuted person before the refutation is accepted

https://youtu.be/5TdqimZf0zY

To be continued InShaaAllaah

Jarh Wat Tadeel [A Reminder to The Prattler – (Stooge of the Hizbiyyoon at Markaz As’Sunnah -Allies of Greenlane and Jamiat Ahle Hadith UK in Stoke OnTrent)- Who Seeks Excuses For The Deviants of Ihyaa At-Turaath]

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on . Posted in Deviated Callers & Individuals, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Indeed, the prattler- stooge of the Hizbiyyoon at Markaz As’Sunnah- is grasping at straws and seeking for ways to justify his deviations and that of his companions at Markaz as’Sunnah. This necessitates that he will follow desires and further abandon sound principles. So he desperately presents the statements of praise for Ihyaa At-Turaath, whilst being wilfully oblivious of the fact that he only increases himself in misguidance. So here we present to the reader few issues about Jarh Wat-Tadeel (Criticism and Praise)…

The Correct Stance on the Differing of the Scholars Regarding Jarh and Tadeel –By Shaikh Ubaid

http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/11/the-correct-stance-towards-the-differing-of-the-scholars-concerning-jarh-and-tadeel-shaikh-ubaid-may-allaah-preserve-him/

Shaikh Rabee on Those Who Utilise the raise of other scholars to reject evidences

http://www.salaficentre.com/2012/05/shaikh-rabee-on-al-jarh-wa-tadeel-criticism-praise-2/

Shaikh Muhammad Baazmool Clarifies Issues of Jarh Wat-Tadeel

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/printthread.cfm?Forum=23&Topic=1113

A Rely to the Hizbiyyoon -Those Who hide behind the Mashaayikh

http://www.abukhadeejah.com/but-shaikh-so-and-so-went-to-their-conference-so-they-must-be-good-right-shaikh-ubaid-answers/

So after acquainting ourselves with the fact that the detailed criticism against Ihyaa At-Turaath takes precedence over the general praise they have received, the dishonesty of the stooge becomes apparent. Here are the statements of the scholars against Ihyaa At-Turaath in Arabic for the stooge. May Alaah guide him or protect us from his falsehood Aameen

http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/01/arabic-audio-scholars-speak-against-ihyaa-turaath/

 

Previous and Recent Responses to that Prattler – [A Stooge of the Hizbiyyoon at Markaz As-Sunnah -Allies of Greenlane and Jamiat Ahle Hadith UK in (Stoke-On-Trent)]

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on . Posted in Announcements, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Firstly: The following links contain a rebuttal of that stooge of the Hizbiyyoon at Markaz as-Sunnah (The allies of Greenlane in Stoke-On-Trent) – a caller who sought and still seeks to spread his absurd doubts amongst some of the brothers by way of text messages.

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2015/08/31/1-a-notification-to-the-confused-and-bewildered-caller-to-brotherhood-at-markaz-as-sunnah-stoke-on-trent-allies-of-the-hizbiyyoon-of-greenlanes-admin/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2015/09/01/2-a-notification-to-the-confused-and-bewildered-caller-to-brotherhood-at-markaz-as-sunnah-stoke-on-trent-help-yourself-before-you-help-others-because-you-are-in-need-of-sound-manhaj-otherwise/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2015/09/01/3-a-notification-to-the-confused-and-bewildered-caller-to-brotherhood-at-markaz-as-sunnah-stoke-on-trent-obtain-clear-knowledge-of-what-blameworthy-taqleed-is-before-accusing-others-based-on-ja/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2015/09/02/4-the-confused-and-bewildered-caller-to-brotherhood-markaz-as-sunnah-stoke-on-trent-said-hujja-is-quraan-and-hadeeth-besides-prophet-muhammad-peace-be-upon-him-e/

Secondly: The stooge has started spreading his doubts again and we have already started a series of articles to address issues around his shubuhaat. See the following links:

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/18/whoever-sits-with-ahlul-bidah-is-not-safe-from-one-of-three-calamities-by-imaam-sufyaan-ath-thawri/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/18/salaf-fled-from-ahlul-bidah-but-some-masaakeen-youths-end-up-in-misguidance-due-to-accompanying-ahlul-bidah/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/18/do-the-salafiyyoon-of-masjid-al-furqaan-believe-that-one-is-declared-a-mubtadi-straight-away-if-he-does-not-make-tabdee-of-a-mubtadi-a-reply-to-one-of-the-devilish-insinuations-of-some-of-the-hizbiy/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/18/manhaj-questions-and-answers-on-the-opposers-innovators-on-companionship-tabdee-hajar-and-related-affairs/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/15/part-1-thorns-in-the-throats-of-the-hizbiyyoon-of-our-town-allies-of-greenlane/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/16/part-2-thorns-in-the-throats-of-the-hizbiyyoon-of-our-town-allies-of-greenlane/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/16/part-3-thorns-in-the-throats-of-the-hizbiyyoon-of-our-town-allies-of-jamiat-ahle-hadith-uk/

Finally: The hizbiyyoon at Markaz As-Sunnah (allies of Greenlane and Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth UK) keep silent as if they do not desire any fitna, yet they are shelterers of this stooge -loud mouth- who is foolish enough to spread Shubuhaat. Therefore, we will –InShaaAllaah continue to warn against his doubts.  May Allaah guide him or protect us from his evil. Aameen

Part 1: Thorns In The Throats of The Hizbiyyoon of Our Town [Allies of Greenlane]

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on . Posted in Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

A Destructive Manhaj of The Mu’mayyi’oon!

https://www.salaficentre.com/2016/07/reminder-adopt-particular-path-ihyaa-turaaths-mentor-order-harm-sp-salafiyyoon-west/

Arabic Audio: Scholars Unveil The Misguidance of Ihyaa At-Turaath

http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/01/arabic-audio-scholars-speak-against-ihyaa-turaath/

Verdicts of the scholars against Abul Hasan al-Maribi

https://www.salaficentre.com/2014/04/verdicts-of-the-scholars-against-abul-hasan-al-maribi-al-mubtadi-an-ally-of-masjid-as-sunnah/

Regarding Abu al-Hasan al-Ma’ribee al-Ikhwani: Why Shaykh Rabee’ Was Correct and Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin al-Abbaad Was Wrong (Yet Both Are Rewarded)

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/nvskb-why-shaykh-rabee-was-correct-and-shaykh-abdul-muhsin-al-abbaad-was-wrong-yet-both-are-rewarded.cfm

 

 

Are the issues between Greenlane Mosque and Masjid As-Salafi Person?

https://www.salaficentre.com/2015/08/are-the-issues-between-greenlane-mosque-and-masjid-as-salafi-personal-listen-to-this-unquestionable-clarification/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brief Acquaintance With The Facts Behind Unjustified and Justified Criticisms!

Written by enamul97@icloud.com on . Posted in Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

A sensible and honest person should ask himself/herself: “What is the basis of Shaikh Wasiyullaah’s criticism against Maktabah Salafiyyah and what is the basis of the praises received by Maktabah Salafiyyah from Shaikh Rabee, Shaikh ‘Ubaid, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadee, Shaikh Abdullaah al-Bukhaari, Shaikh Hasan al-Banna and others?

Indeed, the basis of Shaikh’s Wasiyullaah’s criticism was due to the uncompromising and courageous stance Maktabah As-Salafiyyah took against Suhaib Hasan, Abdul Haadi, Jamiat ahle Hadeeth and Abu Usaama. This is the basis of the Shaikh’s criticisms. So before examining the evidences, ask yourself the following questions:

So ask yourself the following questions:

*Does Maktabah As- Salafiyyah defend or co-operate with a single Mubtadi?

*Does Maktabah As-Salafiyyah have any links with a single Mubtadi or an organization that defends Mubtadi’ah?

 *Do they co-operate with the Jamaa’aat Siyaasiyah or those who co-operate with such Jamaa’aat?

*Do they co-operate with any other group of bidah or anyone associated with them?

*Do they promote the innovated principles of Hasan Al-Banna and Ikhwaan al muslimeen, or associate with anyone who does so?

*Do they uphold the false Manhaj of Muwaazanah or associate with anyone who promotes such false principles?

*Do they defend Sayyid Qutb or co-operate with anyone who defends him?

*Do they endorse the false principles: “We do not disparage but we only correct mistakes’’ and “Let’s not make our differing about someone else a reason for differing amongst ourselves.’’

*Do they make a differentiation between Aqeedah and Manhaj when the scholars pass judgements against the people of bidah, or do they have a link with anyone who calls to these false principles?

*Do they hold the false view that the Salaf differed in Aqeedah, or do they have a link with anyone who holds this false view?

*Do they revile the Sahaabah and defend those who call them Ghuthaa-iyyah, or co-operate with anyone who defends such people?

*Do they utilise innovated principles in order to place the misguided sects, parties and organizations into the arena of ahlus Sunnah, or do they co-operate with anyone who deliberately utilises such false principles?

*Do they utilise the principles of the contemporary Mubtadi’ah, such as Ali Al-Halabi, Abul Hasan al-Maribi, Muhammad Al-Maghraawi, Yahyah al-Hajoori and others similar to them, or do they co-operate with anyone who defends these Mubtadi’ah after being well aware of the unambiguous knowledge based refutations against them?

*Do they praise Ahmad Raza Khan Brelvi, or was it Abdul Haadi who praised Him?

*Do they praise the Mubtadi – Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq- or was it not Abu Usaama who transmitted a praise on his behalf?

Examine the reality of the following people!

Are The Issues Between Greenlane Mosque [GLM] and Salafipublications Person?

http://www.abukhadeejah.com/are-the-issues-between-green-lane-mosque-glm-and-salafi-publications-personal/

 

What is the reality of jamiat ahle hadeeth

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=3384

What is the reality of suhaib hasan

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=19&Topic=1637

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=9215

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=12494

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=12079

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=12076

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=7334

What is the reality of abdul Hadi

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=6023

What is the reality of abu usama

http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1216-A-Response-to-the-Deceit-of-Abu-Usaamah-Khalifah-and-His-Lying-Tongue

So after examining the evidences against the above organizations and individuals, do we find Maktabah As-Salafiyyah upon these clear Manhaj errors? Do we find the students at Maktabah Salafiyyah upon the platforms of the innovators? Indeed, never do we find Maktabah As- Salafiyyah co-operating with the people of bidah and this is a favour of Allaah upon them. Therefore, do we ignore the proofs and follow desires, or do we ask Allaah for Tawfeeq and follow what is correct? A sensible and honest person knows that the Manhaj of Greenlane and Jamiat Ahl Hadeeth is tainted with Hizbiyyah based on their companions and affiliates mentioned above. We ask Allaah for Ikhlaas, Thabaat, Sidq and Husnul Khaatimah…Aameen.